In this case, who is more vulnerable: the human who built the machine or the machine who is controlled by a human?
Videos
Kid interacting with “çocuk” kinetic sculpture
Optimization of Parenting, Part 2
Optimization of Parenting, Part 2 is a robot arm that reacts whenever a baby in the bassinet cries or awakes from sleep.
Addie Wagenknecht
Addie Wagenknecht, “Optimization of Parenthood, Part 2,” 2012
Robots enable bees and fish to talk to each other
Anti-Drawing Machine
[…] Anti-Drawing Machine project explores possible alternatives of how we engage with robots today.
(source)
The mission is to help people with spinal cord injuries work as waiters
(source)
Robots want bitcoin
“There is no isolation once you hack the robot you can disable all kind of safety.”
According to Apa, these vulnerabilities are especially dangerous because human workers have a certain degree of trust working side by side with these robots.
“These type of robots work in the factory alongside people because they are collaborative robots,” he said. “In this case the people trust and they don’t even use helmets.”
Apa said that some of these collaborative robots have enough strength to fracture a human skull.
Source: Hacked Retail Robots Can Assault Customers… | Motherboard
This does not irritate or harm the robot
Dances with robots
Come on! Just stab it properly FFS
(thx @m_pf)
PS: Hey New Scientist, what the hell is that weird robot dance supposed to illustrate at the end of the clip?